\n
The theory of psychological type<\/b>, developed from Carl Jung’s work, gives you the vocabulary. It says people have consistent preferences in how they take in information and how they make decisions: outward-focused or inward-focused, detail-first or pattern-first, logic-first or values-first, plan-first or option-first. Four preference pairs, combined, produce sixteen distinct types. This is the layer that makes a report specific to the individual.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n
Temperament theory<\/b> gives you the altitude. Instead of sixteen separate labels to learn, it groups the sixteen types into four families that share a core drive, whether that’s the big strategic picture, the people and meaning behind the work, keeping the operation running, or working hands-on with what’s real and in front of them. A team can read its temperament mix at a glance, long before anyone has memorized all sixteen types.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)<\/b> keeps the whole system honest. It’s the discipline of connecting a thought pattern to an observable behavior, and an observable behavior to a change someone can actually make. Behavior Lab borrows those practical tools and applies them to how people work, not to clinical treatment. Layered onto type and temperament, it’s what turns “here’s your type” into “here’s what to try differently in your next 1:1.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Behavior Lab combines all three into one hybrid system: the specificity of type, the memorability of temperament, and the practicality of CBT. That’s what lets a team learn it in an afternoon and still be using the vocabulary six months later.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n<\/circle>\n<\/circle>\n<\/circle>\nType<\/text>\nTemperament<\/text>\nCBT<\/text>\n\n<\/rect>\nSystem<\/text>\n<\/g>\n<\/svg>\n<\/div>\nType +<\/b> Temperament +<\/b> CBT =<\/b> the Behavior Lab system<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec–tight-top”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\n\n
What makes it different<\/p>\n
\nBuilt for the workplace, not the therapy room. Every part of the report is written in terms of how someone works with others, not clinical language.<\/li>\n Two altitudes in one report: the specific type for individual insight, the temperament family for fast team-level reads.<\/li>\n Behavior-first, not label-first. The goal is a change someone can make Monday morning, not a personality quiz result to file away.<\/li>\n Plain-English type names, built so a person is comfortable saying “I’m a [type]” out loud in a meeting.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec–lg”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\nThe 16 types<\/p>\n
Sixteen types, four temperaments, one shared language.<\/h2>\n Every person lands in one of sixteen types, grouped into four temperament families. Each name is plain-English and built to fit, so people recognize themselves and their teammates on sight.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text]
NT<\/span>Strategists<\/b>Intuitive + Thinking<\/small><\/div>ENTJ<\/span>Captain<\/b>Takes command and drives the mission<\/span><\/div>INTJ<\/span>Cartographer<\/b>Designs the long game<\/span><\/div>ENTP<\/span>Innovator<\/b>Generates ideas and challenges the status quo<\/span><\/div>INTP<\/span>Theorist<\/b>Builds the model and finds the flaw<\/span><\/div><\/div>NF<\/span>Connectors<\/b>Intuitive + Feeling<\/small><\/div>ENFJ<\/span>Multiplier<\/b>Brings out the best in people<\/span><\/div>INFJ<\/span>Sage<\/b>Sees what's beneath the surface<\/span><\/div>ENFP<\/span>Catalyst<\/b>Sparks energy and connects the dots<\/span><\/div>INFP<\/span>Wayfinder<\/b>Anchored in values, tuned to people<\/span><\/div><\/div>SJ<\/span>Operators<\/b>Sensing + Judging<\/small><\/div>ESTJ<\/span>Conductor<\/b>Runs the operation and keeps it on beat<\/span><\/div>ISTJ<\/span>Pillar<\/b>Dependable to the core<\/span><\/div>ESFJ<\/span>Ambassador<\/b>Keeps the team connected and cared for<\/span><\/div>ISFJ<\/span>Mainstay<\/b>Loyal, protective, and always there<\/span><\/div><\/div>SP<\/span>Makers<\/b>Sensing + Perceiving<\/small><\/div>ESTP<\/span>Playmaker<\/b>Bold, persuasive, built for the moment<\/span><\/div>ISTP<\/span>Troubleshooter<\/b>Hands-on problem-solver<\/span><\/div>ESFP<\/span>Dynamo<\/b>Lifts energy and momentum, in real time<\/span><\/div>ISFP<\/span>Designer<\/b>Authentic and quietly creative<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\n\n
Why teams do this<\/p>\n
Most team problems aren’t skill problems. They’re understanding problems.<\/h2>\n Two capable people can still clash for months over something as simple as how much detail to put in an email, or how fast a decision should get made. Behavior Lab doesn’t fix that by adding more process. It gives the team a shared, neutral language for the differences that were already there, so people stop reading a colleague’s style as a character flaw.<\/p>\n
\n
Better communication.<\/b> A shared vocabulary for how people take in information and decide, so “why don’t they just get to the point” becomes “they process out loud, mine is written first.”<\/small><\/div>\nFewer conflicts.<\/b> Most friction is a difference in style, not a difference in goals. Naming the style difference takes the personal sting out of a disagreement.<\/small><\/div>\nFaster onboarding.<\/b> A new hire and their manager understand each other’s working style from day one instead of feeling it out over months of trial and error.<\/small><\/div>\nStronger collaboration.<\/b> Managers can pair people deliberately, knowing who thinks in options and who needs the plan spelled out, instead of guessing.<\/small><\/div>\nReal self-awareness.<\/b> People see their own blind spots in writing, not just their strengths, from a source that isn’t a performance review.<\/small><\/div>\nAppreciating differences.<\/b> The “difficult” teammate often turns out to be differently wired, not wrong, and that reframe is usually what actually changes the relationship.<\/small><\/div>\n<\/div>\n For a manager specifically, the individual reports are a practical tool before a hard conversation or a delegation decision, and the group snapshot shows whether the team is clustered in one temperament corner (strong in one way, blind in another) or genuinely balanced.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec–lg”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\n
What you get<\/p>\n
A report for every person, and one for the whole team.<\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec–tight-top”][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]\nTheir type, in depth.<\/h3>\n Four-letter type with percentage scores on every dimension, a written profile of strengths and blind spots, and a branded PDF.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text]
Extraversion<\/div>
<\/b><\/i><\/div>Introversion<\/div><\/div>
Sensing<\/div>
<\/b><\/i><\/div>iNtuition<\/div><\/div>
Thinking<\/div>
<\/b><\/i><\/div>Feeling<\/div><\/div>
Judging<\/div>
<\/b><\/i><\/div>Perceiving<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]\n
Your team, at a glance.<\/h3>\n Temperament distribution across the whole group, so you can see where your team clusters and where the gaps are.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text]
NT<\/small>Strategists<\/b><\/div>NF<\/small>Connectors<\/b><\/div>SJ<\/small>Operators<\/b><\/div>SP<\/small>Makers<\/b><\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row content_placement=”middle” el_class=”bl-sec”][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text]\n The workshop<\/p>\n
Pair it with a workshop your team will actually enjoy.<\/h2>\n Just like every TeamTuneUp training, the Behavior Lab Personality Style Workshop delivers deep, lasting insight in a fun, engaging, interactive way, with proprietary exercises that keep your team active and involved.<\/p>\n
Book a workshop<\/a><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/2″]Duration<\/dt> 2.5 to 4 hours<\/dd><\/div>Group size<\/dt> 6 to 2,000+<\/dd><\/div>Activity level<\/dt> Low \u00b7 indoor<\/dd><\/div>Season<\/dt> Year round<\/dd><\/div>Format<\/dt> Onsite or virtual<\/dd><\/div>Includes<\/dt> Online profiling system<\/dd><\/div><\/dl>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\nHow it works<\/p>\n
From access code to team synergy.<\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text]<\/i><\/div>Enter your code<\/h3> One link, one company code, no accounts to set up.<\/p><\/div>
Take the assessment<\/h3> A short, honest set of questions. Not timed. No wrong answers.<\/p><\/div>
Get your profile<\/h3> Instant results on screen, by email, and as a branded PDF.<\/p><\/div>
See the team & grow<\/h3> Managers get the team snapshot; a workshop turns insight into lasting change.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_class=”bl-sec”][vc_column][vc_column_text]\n
\n
What teams say<\/p>\n
\n
“Know that you made an impact here with the information that you shared. I have heard back from a few people who stated that their online score resembled the in-class determination. The overall feedback from the day has been very positive, including the content, the activities, and your delivery. I really appreciate your guidance in planning the day. I’d say it was a huge success!!”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Leslie C., Director of Training, Kiddie Academy<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
“We learned a lot about our team and had a terrific time during the process!”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Marianne S., Shire Pharma<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
“…This was money well spent. I recommend you 100%.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Father C. F., Vocation Director, Jesuits Vocational Teams<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n[vc_row el_id=”quote” el_class=”bl-sec”][vc_column el_class=”bl-cta-dark”]
Get started<\/span>Give your team a deeper understanding of themselves and each other.<\/h2> From $3,850 for up to 20 participants \u00b7 $97 each additional<\/p>